It’s Chank’s font sale time. Deals change weekly. Through July 31.
Fresh off the letterpress:
You can’t hardly not buy a font for a dollar.
Here’s a welcome update on the California privacy bill that’s been kicking around Sacramento for years: it finally passed!
Senate Bill 1, which was passed and signed last year, will go into effect beginning today. The law requires banks, brokerages, insurance companies and other financial services companies to obtain their clients’ permission before selling or sharing information about them with outside parties, as well as giving consumers the right to “opt out” of information sharing within the same family of companies.
“We think this is an enormous victory for California consumers,” said Shelley Curran, a lobbyist for Consumers Union.
Here’s the text of the bill: SB 1: Financial institutions: nonpublic personal information.
I saw Fahrenheit 9/11 last night. I think I learned more about my town than about the Bush administration.
The local theater often sells out shows on Tuesday nights, because they drop their prices for selected films to $3.50. “Tightwad Tuesday” is a local tradition; I know people who go to the theater at 7pm on Tuesdays without knowing or caring what’s showing — they pick a movie from the “cheap” list once they arrive.
Fahrenheit 9/11 tickets were not on sale, but the auditorium filled up faster than for any other movie I’ve seen there. Not only did it fill up, not only did it fill up early… my row was asked to move one seat to the right to consolidate open seats at the other end. This wasn’t about entertainment; this was a community education effort.
After 9pm, the theater lobby is a ghost town, usually. After Fahrenheit 9/11, it was full. Sixty people were standing around in small groups, talking about what they’d seen, exchanging horrific Bush anecdotes that didn’t appear in the film.
So, the movie didn’t shock me, but the scene did. I knew this to be a pretty liberal town because it’s populated almost entirely by aging hippies. (BTW, that’s not a slam; I aspire to be an aging hippie.) But getting a bunch of liberals, especially the aging-hippie variety, behind a single cause takes a compelling story. Like a war, I guess.
(This is day 2, part 3 of a 4-part series on world-class focaccia.)
The Crust & Crumb instructions for focaccia dough are clear and complete, so far as the actual mixing procedure goes. I’ll elaborate on three areas: quantity, scaling, and shaping.
The recipe as written makes 74 oz. of dough, which in my experience is too big for a home mixer. I often make a 2/3 or 3/4 recipe because these sizes are easier to handle. If I need more bread, I’ll make two 2/3 recipes, which is just enough for three sheet pans and will feed 30 people. I’ve written the .67x and .75x quantities into additional columns on my copy of the recipe; I recommend calculating these in advance, rather than on the fly while the mixer is running. (Never leave your mixer unattended.)
Home sheet pans measure about 18x12 inches and will take approximately 36 oz. of dough (2 lbs., 4 oz.) to fill. The best way to “scale” focaccia or any bread dough is with a fancy digital weight-measuring tool.
Filling the pans properly takes a few steps not adequately explained in Crust & Crumb (although they are documented, with photos, in the sequel, The Bread Baker’s Apprentice). I learned these techniques in class with Peter Reinhart:
The recipe in Crust & Crumb calls for toppings to be added at this point. I have had better luck topping the dough later, immediately prior to baking, especially when I’m using heavy toppings (such as tomato slices) that could prevent the dough from rising. I’ll discuss toppings in greater detail in the 4th and final installment of this series.
Whether you top the doughs now or later, the bagged pans should go into the refrigerator to rest overnight.
From Macintouch comes news of the EFF’s sample legal complaint against Apple, Toshiba, CNET for supporting copyright infringement.
Thus there can be no doubt that Apple materially relies on illegal infringement by its customers to support the commercial viability of its iPod and to maintain its high price in the marketplace.
The complaint is not real. It simply demonstrates the threat. Could the big music companies really make iPods and small disk drives and hardware reviews illegal? Under the INDUCE Act, it could happen.
At all times relevant to this complaint, Defendant Toshiba knew or should have known that Apple’s iPod would be used to induce infringement.
There’s a nice take-action site here: Save the iPod, Stop the INDUCE Act.
(It’s a new trend — enacting legislation to prevent technical progress. See the recent GMail privacy laws story for more.)