This is my admission that my writing is in remission. I’m not catching up and can no longer pretend to be… depite the fact that I’ve backdated this entry by two days.
Let’s see, I went to Hawaii, then suffered the holiday time-crunch (shopping, decorations, secular Christmas cards, fancy meals, assembly of kid toys), then had houseguests, then migrated this website and too many others to a new server when the old one died, then celebrated a birthday which required shopping for a laptop and spending a couple late nights designing a custom database application. Meanwhile, my job appears to have performed some sort of asexual reproduction, leaving me with not quite two, but certainly 1.5 complete jobs, one of which I should probably outsource to India.
Also I went to Mac World Expo, but it was so small it didn’t actually take any time.
Despite an internal pledge to have a little more presence around here over the coming days than previously, I’ve removed the “Flake Rate” statistics from the sidebar. There’s an unexpected inertia to not writing; the longer the break, the harder it is to start back up. Maybe this will help. (Tune back in in six weeks to see.)
With apologies to all my friends who bought SUVs because they thought their kids would be safer inside… Here’s a revealing study from the Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics:
Children are no safer in a hefty sport utility vehicle (SUV) during a crash than they would be in a standard sedan, researchers here reported.
Any potential safety advantage of the SUV’s greater size and weight is offset by their increased tendency to roll over in a crash compared with sedans cars, said Lauren Daly, M.D., of the A.I. Dupont Hospital for Children here.
… Rollover crashes increased the risk of injury in both vehicle types … and occurred more than twice as frequently with SUVs…
Thanks to Bim (who is also not any safer in an SUV in a crash) for the tip. Keep ‘em coming.
Continuing my theme of holiday unpleasantness… we woke on New Year’s Eve to learn that the power was out.
One of the ironies of grid-tied photovoltaic systems is that, sunshine or no, they don’t generate electricity if there’s no grid. Or in English, when the power goes out, the PV array goes out too.
It wouldn’t have been such a big deal if we didn’t have out-of-state guests en route for a fancy dinner… I had baguettes in the works, a pair of upscale pork tenderloins — yes, actual meat products! — soaking up my special garlic-and-peppercorn brine, and two nice bottles of Pinot Noir in the cellar.
PG&E’s automated telephone system informed me that the outage was known, but “repair crews are not able to access the equipment,” causing me to picture a group of burly linemen standing around a locked toolshed looking for the key. The outage reporting system suggested I should call back at 10:00 AM.
At 10:00 AM, the message suggested calling back at 2:00 PM, an ominous sign — nine hours with no power and no progress. The skies had cleared, but our lights were still out.
At 1:30 PM (call me impatient), the message said that I needn’t call back until 10:00 PM! Our inbound guests, who had been killing time elsewhere until we had power (or at least news of power), changed their plans and drove to visit family farther up the coast.
Meanwhile, my baguette dough sat in a bowl in the kitchen of my cold house. I couldn’t bake it, but didn’t have the heart to throw it away. It was growing like the Blob, although a lot slower, and without actually eating me, my family, my house, and the rest of Sonoma County.
Newly without dinner plans, or a suitable mood for New Year’s Eve, we headed downtown to drown our sorrows in a cup of tea and a selection of vegan cookies. Free holiday celebration tip: if you’re looking to cheer yourself up, stay the hell away from vegan cookies. But I digress. Before drowning our sorrows, we nearly drowned our car; Highway 12 just east of Sebastopol was under three feet of water. This was probably the reason PG&E couldn’t access its equipment. They probably couldn’t access the town.
But PG&E came through, somehow, restoring power about 4:30, which gave me just enough time to flip the baguette dough into rough batards and shortly thereafter (a paltry 20-minute rise) onto a not-exactly-hot-yet baking stone before rushing to join friends for an impromptu, post-power-failure dinner.
We brought the pork. It was great, or so I’m told.
The baguettes turned out surprisingly well considering that the dough had been rising more than twice as long than necessary. I expected the yeast to have expired, but I got a decent oven spring. Having no heat in the house contributed to this success; every 18 degrees of temperature change doubles or halves a dough’s rise time — above 40° or so, anyway.
So, all things considered, we ended up having a nice time on New Year’s anyway, despite those vegan cookies.
trail miles hiked: 35 (+159%)
pack weight increase, in pounds: ~19 (+600%)
number of journal entries published here: 220 (-44%)
number of journal entries composed: 250
good intentions dashed: 30
number of books read: 6 (-70%)
number of movies seen: 28 (-52%)
number of Matrix episodes watched: 0 (-100%!)
tech conferences attended: 4
business cards exchanged: 43
followup emails written: 6
good intentions dashed: 37
number of vacation trips taken: 4 (+33%)
total nights spent away from home: 39 (+129%)
digital photographs taken: 2978 (+38%)
nicer cameras lusted for: 4 (+100%)
nicer cameras purchased: 1
instances of buyer’s remorse: 1
pageviews served by this website: 704,338 (+122%)
dollars spent on connectivity and hosting: 2705 (+7%)
days of time lost to server hardware maintenance: 3 (-50%)
electricity generated via photovoltaic array, in kWh: 3898 (+0.2%)
bigger arrays lusted for: 2
bands quit: 1
sappy Creedence tunes forgotten: 3
moments too soon: 0
songs written: 1/2 (-50%)
songs recorded: 7 (+40%)
takes needed: n/a (too many to count)
CDs purchased: 4 (-60%)
MP3 tracks purchased: 112 (+124%)
loaves of bread or pizzas made: 57 (-17%)
in how many U.S. states: 3
number of times I smuggled sourdough through airport security, in my pocket: 2
children raised: 1
moments of joy experienced: n/a (too many to count)
(Percent-change figures are relative to 2004)
I wish I’d taken a photo of the image that inspired the title of this story: the UPS guy walking down the driveway with a stack of boxes from Amazon.com in his arms. Brown truck, brown shirt, brown pants, brown boxes.
He was carrying our Christmas gifts: some fancy crystal wine glasses and a new digital camera.
The wine glasses don’t really go with our recycled-glass tumblers, but you have to like the thin rims and the pure, high-pitched sound that resonates for 5 seconds when you clink them together. Also, they were half-price (and still are).
The more exciting gift was packed in the smaller two boxes. After three evenings’ worth of poring over reviews and sample images, we decided on the Canon SD450, an “ultracompact” model that is about a quarter the size of my Nikon Coolpix 995. I debated at length whether to get a more feature-rich model like the Powershot S80, which has a wider-angle lens (28mm), semi-manual controls (apeture or shutter priority), and an interface that seemed more intuitive. But it’s bigger all around and weighs twice as much as the SD450, and in the end we decided to get something really small (assuming the image quality would be good, which in this case appears to be true).
After that, we did another iteration of research to see if we could get a tiny camera with a fold-out LCD. I made an inventory of all the available cameras with that feature, and slowly eliminated every one of them: they’re all too big, or flawed in some other way. The SD450 is about the size of a deck of cards, small enough to carry around in a pocket.
(The third box from Amazon contained a spare battery. Why did they ship it separately? That makes as little sense as, well, not having a second battery for a digital camera. But then, I’m all about backups.)