DEBRIS.COMgood for a laugh, or possibly an aneurysm

Wednesday, August 15th, 2001

sweaty palms at 8000 feet

I am only slightly embarrassed to share with you the following irrational and complicated fear: I am deathly afraid of being suspended far above the ground by a cable. Or, more specifically, I’m deathly afraid of falling, especially after having been temporarily and unsuccessfully suspended far above the ground by a cable.

This is not a fear of heights. I ride elevators and airplanes without issue. I peer over the edge from roofs of tall buildings, peaks of mountains, and bridges with no problem. I’ve ridden up the Gateway Arch many times, leaned heavily on the thin metal walls 630 feet above the plaza, and felt the structure sway in the wind. And I’ve even ridden the aerial tram at Sterling Vineyards a half-dozen times with barely a quiver.

On the other hand, I quit a snow-skiing class after only a half-day because the instructor expected me to ride a chair lift that went about a mile into the air. Yeah, right!

And I nearly squeezed fingernail dents into the metal seat on the Kölner Seilbahn, the sky-tram that lifts riders way too high over the Rhine River in Cologne, Germany, in tiny cars that are much too small to die in if you know what I mean. This virtual tour only hints at my pain. (browsing tip: “nächstes Bild” means “next picture”)

So it was with some trepidation that I agreed to ride the Jasper Tramway, an aerial tram up the side of Whistlers Mountain, in Jasper National Park. Face your fears, I muttered to myself behind nervous laughter and transparently false bravado, as all the blood drained from my head to leave me dizzily contemplating the climb of packed tramcars into the afternoon sky. I had a long time to contemplate, too — the line ahead of us was the season’s longest. I stood there for an hour, watching a dozen groups of 30 people ascend to maddening heights over the mountainside, imagining grisly deaths from falling and the snap of the 8800-foot cable whipping down the mountain, clearcutting acres of old-growth spruce and perhaps beheading a few hundred tourists as well.

I knew I could handle it — really, all you have to do is stand there. Like I said, it’s an irrational fear, not that that knowledge keeps my pulse steady when I’m equally certain I’m about to plunge two hundred feet into the asphalt parking lot. If I can walk on fire, I remember thinking, I can certainly handle this.

And so I did. The ascent was uneventful, and I arrived safe and sane at the top, breathing normally, with all my fingernails intact. It was, after all that, a non-event.

Queueing up for the ride back down the mountain, I was proud to have no residual fear. I even planned to film the descent through an open window in the car. Yet while I waited, I shifted the video camera from one hand to the other to notice a palm-shaped pool of nervous sweat on the side of the case — a wet handprint that belied my newfound nonchalance. Maybe I’m about to die after all! I thought in a moment of panic.


Tags:
posted to channel: Travel
updated: 2004-04-19 05:16:46

Tuesday, August 14th, 2001

airport etiquette

Of all the places in the world where people are often confused and/or lost, airports contain the highest concentration of people who are looking somewhere other than where they’re walking.

Visitor confusion is easily explained: tight schedules, crowds, a lack of legible signage, etc. But people are confused in lots of places, and this doesn’t always result in effectively blinded automatons who’d as soon run you down as step around you. The difference, I’ve decided, is momentum.

Because in addition to the melange of obvious distractions, airports suffer from a population burdened with heavy luggage: suitcases, duffle bags, briefcases, trunks, backpacks, sample cases, diaper bags, coats, purses, cameras, pet carriers, and so on. When saddled with gear, many people apparently believe that walking in any direction is preferable to stepping out of traffic, determining where to go, and only then continuing.

The only explanation I can think of for this behavior is that too much energy would be required to stop and restart forward motion: in an attempt to prevent a dramatic loss of energy (which might be needed later when elbowing through a crowded aisle to lift 300 lbs of carry-on crap into the overhead compartment), many travelers opt to continue in their original direction until faced with a compelling need to turn — e.g. a solid wall, a fellow traveler, or a sign elsewhere indicating once and for all that one’s ultimate destination lies over there.

There’s a related, and equally regrettable behavior type that is evident at airports: folks that stop in the middle of the corridor and slowly turn 360 degrees to figure out where to go next. This is an energy-saving play, too, although it’s interpreted differently: walking in the wrong direction is a waste, whereas stopping and starting is just a necessary evil. The problem, of course, is that everyone walking behind these folks has to stop short or hop around, or traffic backs up. (In ideal cases, everybody stops short in a straight line, until someone at the back end isn’t quick enough and knocks the whole line down like dominos.)

So anyway, I stepped off an escalator at SFO last Saturday and was nearly toppled by a man with two heavy suitcases. He was walking straight at me, but his head was turned 90 degrees to the right. “Am I supposed to be over there?” he was thinking. “I’d better keep walking this way until I’m sure.” I was able to step around him, but unfortunately caught his eye, and his attention, just before he marched up the down-escalator, which I’d have liked to see.

I stood still, watching for a few seconds, marveling at this guy’s thoughtlessness — he just assumes everyone else is looking out, making room for him — when some other jerk shoulders around me, muttering “Don’t stop in the middle of the corridor!”

Imagine the nerve!


Tags:
posted to channel: Travel
updated: 2005-06-20 16:19:47

Monday, August 13th, 2001

reunion

I just received an invitation to my 20-year grade school reunion. I think I’d be happier to be listed in the “missing in action” group than the “invited classmates” group — some 33 people who I haven’t thought of or heard from in the ten years since the last reunion, which I attended after a fit of ill-advised nostalgia.

It’s not that I had a bad time at the last reunion, so much as the fact that I haven’t been in contact with any of those people since then. I’m sure if I went to this gathering, I’d soon glow with the same warm and fuzzy feelings I had ten years ago, although in that case, I think I had one too many cheap canned beers first. (There’s something about drinking lukewarm Budweiser in one’s grade-school cafeteria that lends a surreal quality to any social gathering. Perhaps they should hire out for dramatic presentations, wedding receptions, and the like.)

I have to admit, my first thought upon opening the invitation was to send back the reply envelope empty. Heh.


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2004-02-22 22:49:16

Wednesday, August 8th, 2001

writing about reading

I’ve just finished a reading binge. If you’re looking for recommendations for some great fiction, take a look at my late summer reading list.

The best of the best: The Man Who Wrote The Book, Harmful Intent, Survivor, Holes, Sick Puppy, microserfs.

Disclosure: purchases made through the provided links to Amazon will result in small payments to me. Please don’t be offended — I promise not to get rich at your expense. If everyone who reads this site regularly bought two books, I’d make enough money to buy … about two books. As ugly as such blatant capitalism can be, it might one day help offset the cost of hosting this website.


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2004-02-22 22:49:16

Tuesday, August 7th, 2001

D.C.P.I.

The Debris.com Personality Inventory

Remember, “multiphasic” is just another word for
“we couldn’t get it right the first time.”

Creamy or crunchy? Scrambled or fried? Ketchup or mayo? Links or patties? White or whole-wheat? The pink or the blue? Butter-flavored machine oil, or not?

Regular or decaf? Sparkling or still? Red or white? Shaken or stirred? Rocks or straight? Coke or Pepsi?

Paper or plastic? Automatic or manual? Briefs or boxers? Fold or crumple? Shoei or Arai? Metric or standard? Digital or analog? Window or aisle? Nylon tip or wood? IDE or SCSI? Own or rent? Gay or straight? Smoking or non? Real or silicon? vi or emacs?


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2004-02-22 22:49:16

Search this site


< April 2002 >
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        


Carbon neutral for 2007.