DEBRIS.COMgood for a laugh, or possibly an aneurysm

Friday, June 4th, 2004

please, no more!

This is the last word on SUVs, I promise. For this week, I mean.

Philip Greenspun’s weblog spawned an interesting discussion on the merits of SUVs. Both sides of the debate are represented.

The original question was, Can SUVs remain fashionable when only unfashionable people drive them? Click the “comments” link below the main entry.


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2004-06-04 13:54:56

SUV rollover verdict

Bim forwarded this story about Ford’s courtroom loss in an SUV rollover case (mirror):

SAN DIEGO — A jury has ordered Ford Motor Co. to pay nearly $369 million to a woman paralyzed in a rollover accident involving a Ford Explorer, the nation’s best-selling sport utility vehicle…
The trial, which began March 15, involved a January 2002 accident on an interstate highway near Alpine, Calif., east of San Diego. The driver, Benetta Buell-Wilson, swerved to avoid a metal object and lost control of her 1997 Explorer, which rolled 4 1/2 times.

This is a precedent-setting case. It will be referenced in every SUV rollover lawsuit for the next 100 years, or until SUVs stop rolling over.

Here’s a frightening quote from Ford spokesperson Kathleen Vokes (mirror) (emphasis mine):

“We can appreciate the empathy that this jury felt for the plaintiff, but this was an extremely severe crash caused by the driver and any SUV would have rolled over under similar circumstances.”


Tags:
posted to channel: Automotive
updated: 2005-03-08 18:17:37

Thursday, June 3rd, 2004

the argument for solar

The weekend Chron’s Real Estate section had a nice article about a custom home in Berkeley: Lean, clean and green: Berkeley builders toss the plans and create a work of art

A companion piece explained the builder’s struggles with making the home earth-friendly: It’s not easy being green:

The house … was built with the infrastructure in place for a solar electric system, solar hot water and geothermal exchange…

Builder David Bass hopes the new owners will be willing to spend the $25,000 or so for the solar panels, pumps and other parts and labor to complete the job.

“It seems to me the logical extension of building a house well is to make it green. It just makes sense. A house should be healthy, and it should last a long time. I think the world’s finally coming around to that point of view,” Bass said.

If he had had the budget, Bass would have delivered the complete package, but he admits it’s still a struggle to capture the hearts and minds of buyers.

“Green is good, but it’s not sexy. One of the things I hated about the [Berkeley Hills] fire zone — still hate — is that there’s all that money up there and clients spend it on marble and granite and Sub-Zeros.

“If you’re going to spend $5 million on a house, you can spend $40,000 to make it energy efficient. Unfortunately, many people don’t think that way.”

If that’s true, it’s a pity.

My only quibble with this otherwise excellent article is the following quote, again from David Bass, the builder of this $1.5 million dollar home:

What I’ve learned is that solar and geothermal aren’t going to happen universally before they make economic sense.

But they do make economic sense. My PV array will pay for itself in about 10 years, and then I’ll get free power for about 20 more. What about that doesn’t make economic sense?*

I know Bass knows this because of his other comments about solar energy being a “long term” investment. I guess his point is that most clients don’t think about long-term costs, but only about the initial purchase price.

(Gee, American consumers are shortsighted? Somebody kick the turntable; the needle is stuck again!)

*Chuck E. pointed out that most homeowners likely do not assume they’ll stay in their current houses for the 10+ years it would take to make a PV investment pay for itself. I didn’t consider this perspective, but there are at least two reasons why solar electric systems still make good economic sense:

And for the whole time, you’re using emissions-free electricity, and reducing the ability of the utility companies to justify hugely expensive and polluting power plants.


Tags:
posted to channel: Solar Blog
updated: 2004-06-05 04:32:05

hybrid driving test

On the topic of hybrid gas/electric cars, here’s a nice article comparing the Toyota Prius, Honda Civic Hybrid, and Ford Escape SUV (hybrid!):
Cutting the hybrid hype

The main points of the article:

Hat tip to Jaques for the link. (I told you he was a frequent correspondent.)


Tags:
posted to channel: Automotive
updated: 2004-10-17 21:05:45

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2004

hemp speaker cones

Tone Tubby hemp-cone speakerAt the intersection of sustainable living and loud rock and roll you’ll find an innovative new speaker cone made of my favorite agricultural product, hemp. My friend Bruce K. pointed this out, and I’m so thrilled with it I may learn to play the guitar just so I can get my speaker cab retrofitted with hempcones.

A writer for Stereophile recounts a demonstration of Tone Tubbies hemp speakers:

With his bass feeding a Mesa Boogie Road Ready 215, he alternated via a switch box between two identical EV-M400 bass cabinets, one fitted with stock drivers and the other fitted with Tone Tubbies. The stock drivers had the edgy, hollow sound of many pro loudspeakers. The Tone Tubbies, by contrast, were full sounding — richer, deeper, smoother, by far more musical and more pleasant to hear.

If that review sounds underwhelming, remember that it describes a solo bass guitar. If a simple speaker change can make a bassist sound musical, it’s not only a good deal, it’s downright miraculous. Heh.

Hemp speakers are used by Carlos Santana, Joe Satriani, Eric Clapton, Phil Lesh, Bob Weir, Billy Gibbons (ZZ Top), Kirk Hammett (Metallica), and Norm Perry, who you’ve probably not heard of but whose band I joined in March. (I just unexpectedly discovered his endorsement of them on the Tone Tubby Field Reports web page.)


Tags:
posted to channel: Music
updated: 2004-06-02 14:53:37

Search this site


< June 2004 >
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      


Carbon neutral for 2007.