DEBRIS.COMgood for a laugh, or possibly an aneurysm

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2005

confessions of a SCSI snob

I’ve been a SCSI snob ever since Apple started using SCSI in the Mac Plus. Even when Apple dumped SCSI in favor of lower-cost IDE/ATA components, which any Mac aficionado will tell you are inferior and slightly embarrassing, and which can be admitted only under one’s breath at the local “Mac Marginalization” meet-up, I remained a power SCSI user, clinging to the notion that because ATA requires a significant amount of oversight by the computer’s CPU, my hotrodded SCSI setup would be faster, sexier, and a lot more fun.

Case in point: my G4 workstation boots from an ATA drive (sshh!), but the applications reside on a striped RAID-0 array built from two Ultra2 Wide SCSI drives attached via a $50 cable (cheap!) to an Ultra2 Wide SCSI PCI card, promising a screaming 80 MB/s of data transfer. Having my apps on a striped volume means read performance should be even faster than that, because both disks can be read in parallel — so that any single drive only has to locate half the data sought.

A mirrored (RAID-1) partition on the same two drives stores my data. Having two copies of all my files means I’m a lot more likely to survive a disk crash without data loss.

But the machine that housed all this high-tech storage magic has been aging. 1000 MHz have never felt so slow. I finally pulled the trigger on a long-awaited upgrade: a dual-cpu G5.

G5First impressions: it’s huge. It weighs over 40 lbs. The case was milled from a single piece of aluminum. By hand! By old-world craftsmen in a small village in rural Germany!

G4My old G4 is smaller, lighter weight, and suddenly very plastic-y looking and quaint. But it has this advantage over the G5: three internal drive bays.

The G5 has exactly one open drive bay. Which means my two Ultra2 Wide SCSI drives would have to find another home. Crap.

I considered an aftermarket drive chassis. I considered external housings. And then I considered that my SCSI drives were just as old as my G4… and a light began to dawn


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2005-09-09 00:18:51

Friday, July 29th, 2005

Corinthian Leather Award: Target Classic picture frame

The crew here at Corinthian Leather Award headquarters has been idle for nearly four years, not so much because there aren’t any fresh instances of ridiculous, laughable, insultingly dumb marketing verbiage, but because we haven’t been shopping. Well, not really.

incredible shrinking picture frameSomebody in Target’s design department is a real math whiz — much smarter than I am, for sure, because he or she can fit “multiple” 4in x 6in photos into a single 8 x 10 frame.

It’s a “4-up” frame with a windowpane design. The windows for the four photos measure 3.5 x 4.5 inches, or about 65% of the area of a 4x6 photo. The ad copy is 35% wrong! I’ve grown sadly accustomed to overpromising and undelivering, but it is rarely so easy to quantify.

65% of a photoPictured at right is an photo of my son cropped to fit this frame’s aspect ratio. I managed to fit more than 65% of him but I guess he’s still just a few percent too tall.

Click for previous Corinthian Leather awards.


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2005-07-30 05:46:39

Thursday, July 28th, 2005

surveillance nation

The EFF reports that color laser printer output contains trackable digital watermarks. I doubt this “feature” is listed on the outside of the box. (“New and improved! The government can identify every page you print!”)

The EFF’s work follows a PC World article from last Fall, which had escaped my notice until now, perhaps because I’ve been busy composing notes of encouragement and support to your President by arranging letters cut from random magazines and gluing them onto scraps of paper rescued from the recycle basket at distant Kinko’s: Government Uses Color Laser Printer Technology to Track Documents

So until somebody slips tiny RFID molecules into my glue stick, I guess I’m still anonymous.


Tags:
posted to channel: Privacy
updated: 2005-07-29 21:53:35

Wednesday, July 27th, 2005

retro tech is not always cool

So I found myself in the car for about four hours today, occasionally scanning the FM band on the off chance I’d find something other than the regular morning masturbation of most radio show hosts during rewinds of the latest Dream Theater album.

I paused the relentless channel-scan on a news program. I realized after a few moments that the station was playing a “newsroom” soundtrack behind the announcer’s voice. It sounded like 100 people frantically hammering on typewriters.

Typewriters? Sheesh, why not telegraphs?

Granted, this particular station’s demographic is old enough for this anachronistic sound to be accepted without question. (“Coming up after the break: The Association! Stay with us.”)

No, it’s not at all ironic that I’m ridiculing the sound of one old technology while listening to another. My car’s cassette player is not deserving of your scorn. Besides, the other car has a CD player. Now leave me alone.


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2005-07-29 05:51:28

Tuesday, July 26th, 2005

preying on stupidity

Sometimes it’s fun to lift up a rock and focus a little white-hot sunlight on the slimy invertebrates underneath…

Quoting from yet-another piece of mortgage junkmail:

If you are like myself [sic], you receive tons of fliers just like this one every week.

Wow, in addition to selling shitty mortgages you also read minds?!?!

Everyone is promising you the “lowest rates” and “best service.”

In contrast, your offer promises the “Worst. Mortgage. Evar.” Except that you spell it “10 year interest-only period followed by 20 yrs P&I,” in mousetype, natch.

There are no upfront fees to apply…

No, of course not. You add them to the loan amount instead.

STOP THROWING AWAY TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EACH YEAR!!

…when you can throw them all away, and some others too, in 10 years after you realize you’ve paid down exactly NONE of that $500,000 jumbo loan, and it is going to cost you 30 years’ worth of interest at then-current rates even though you’ll have only 20 years to pay it off. On the other hand, if you spent some of those tens of thousands of dollars every year on lottery tickets, maybe it will all work out fine.


Tags:
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2005-07-29 04:57:36

Search this site


< March 2006 >
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Carbon neutral for 2007.