DEBRIS.COMgood for a laugh, or possibly an aneurysm

This made me chuckle — day-old, used copies of the new Harry Potter book on sale at Half.com, marked “Read just once!” Thousands of people burned their way through the book’s 759 pages yesterday… and a few dozen of them are trying to recover a bit of the $35 retail price.

I didn’t read the book this weekend, although as a test I timed how long it would take to locate an illegal copy online. The answer: about 15 seconds. It took another minute to pick out the text version; most of them seemed to consist of photographs of the book pages.

But then I bought a copy, the full tree-stump edition, at the local bookstore, which reports having sold 600 of them in the past day and a half. I’d have to guess that makes this their biggest weekend of the year, even at 20% off.

Read more about the rapid devaluation of new media.

Tags: potter, madness
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2007-07-23 12:47:49

Tags: nonsense
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2007-07-19 20:40:46

It’s a Loquat.

Apparently it’s out of season — the fruit is supposed to be ripe in the “late winter or early spring,” not July 1 as in our case.

Speaking of which, while we tried to figure out what sort of tree it is and whether the fruit was any good, most of the fruit has gone bad. The one nice one I could find to show the arborist survived about a half-second past identification, e.g. “Oh, that’s a loquat… <gulp>”

Thanks to the various folks who suggested quince and kumquat: close, but no pie.

Tags: loquat
posted to channel: Personal
updated: 2008-02-01 13:58:51

PG&E launched its carbon-offsetting program last week. It’s called “ClimateSmart.” Ratepayers can sign up with a couple mouse clicks.

What would it cost you per month? Probably about $5. Here’s a cost estimator. You’ll need to have a recent PG&E bill handy, or ideally one from last winter and another from last summer so you can measure average consumption during peak energy-use months.

Thanks to the PV array on my roof, my monthly ClimateSmart fee should be about $0.66.

What do you get for your $5 (or $0.66) per month? According to the website,

100% of your ClimateSmart payment will go to directly funding new greenhouse gas emission reduction projects in California. PG&E will invest these funds in a range of innovative projects, such as conserving and restoring California ecosystems and capturing methane gas from dairy farms. Examples of the types of projects PG&E may invest in include the van Eck forest in Humboldt County and Garcia River forest in Mendocino County, if they are chosen through the competitive selection process.

It seems like a great deal.

Before you sign up, though, read Katherine Ellison’s analysis in Salon: Shopping for carbon credits. She investigates the “new greenhouse gas emission reduction projects in California” and learns that the project first in line for certification may well end up using ClimateSmart money to fund the construction of a new forestry building at Purdue University in Indiana.

To which any right-minded ratepayer can respond only, WTF??

Buying offsets is, at best, the lazy way out of environmental responsibility — as Ellison points out, the only true solution is to reduce emissions at their source — but this particular example is so far removed from actually reducing the carbon level in the atmosphere that instead of eco-mindfulness it inspires only jokes, e.g.: Why would anybody tack $5 onto their monthly utility bill to finance a new schoolroom at an institution whose most memorable contribution to culture is the biggest bass drum in the world?

Ellison decides not to join ClimateSmart, opting instead to save up for double-paned windows and to contribute ~$5/month to support federal election reform — which I agree ought to be at the top of the list of any realistic carbon-offsetting program. (Ellison’s article makes the case that volunteer efforts to reduce emissions are insufficient, that federal regulations are required, and further that “petro-dollar-powered Republican legislators” are never going to make the necessary regulations.)

I find no fault with her reasoning or conclusions, but I signed up for ClimateSmart anyway. I have more faith that the California Climate Action Registry will find some legitimate, non-joke-worthy ways to spend ClimateSmart donations. For example, the manure management idea. OK, maybe that’s going to inspire some jokes too, but at least the benefits are real. For example, read about the Straus Dairy’s methane digester, which not only directly reduces greenhouse gas emissions, but also generates electricity, preventing the need for other fuels to be burned, thereby indirectly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

And if they don’t — if after six months PG&E and the Climate Action Registry are still struggling to find legitimate and productive ways to spend Climate Smart money, I’ll take back my $0.66/month and save up for another acre of rainforest.

Tags: conservation, carbon, offsets, rainforest, methane
posted to channel: Conservation
updated: 2007-07-03 14:07:02

These trees are kicking my ass. We just suffered the worst June ever, following the worst May ever. Our solar electricity production is about a day above last year’s at this time (1644 kWh vs 1634 kWh through June 21) but significantly under the two prior years: 1986 kWh by late June, 2004, is our record.

I noticed during my last trip up to the roof that the tall sycamore across the driveway from the house is now putting 1/3 of our array into shadow at 4:30PM. Needless to say, this nukes our generation for the rest of the afternoon, including 90 critical minutes of the utility’s “peak period.”

The tree in question has also enveloped all the cables coming into the house — data, telephone, and electric — so it has needed attention anyway. (High winds plus tree limbs equal extended power outages.) I’ve scheduled our tree surgeon for a visit next week.

The other problem we’re having is dirty air. I have washed the panels more often this year than any other, every 3 weeks on average, and they seem dirtier than ever before. I scrubbed them clean 11 days ago, and yet when I stand with my eyes just above the plane of the surface of the panels, they look completely opaque with dust. I wonder if more people are burning trash now than in previous years?

There is some good news: our electricity charges for 2007, despite production woes, will be lower than the prior two years. Last year’s fee was ~$160.

I mention the financial aspect to make clear that despite maintenance issues, the PV system on my roof will save me about $1000 in electricity costs this year.

Update 2007-10-18: It wasn’t the trees after all.

Tags: photovoltaic, solar, shading
posted to channel: Solar Blog
updated: 2007-10-19 06:15:31